Scheduled Hearings

Acting in the public interest, the College holds Ontario’s regulated naturopaths accountable for their conduct and practice. The College takes all possible breaches of conduct or practice seriously. The Discipline Committee hears allegations of professional misconduct or incompetence, and the Fitness to Practice Committee hears allegations of incapacity. The College publishes the Discipline Committee’s decisions or summaries of decisions on the website, in its annual report and may publish decisions in the College’s Newsletter.  

Attending a Hearing

Hearings of the Discipline Committee are open to the public (unless otherwise determined), and are held at:

College of Naturopaths of Ontario
150 John Street, 10th Floor
Toronto, ON

Observers must understand and follow the Observer Guidelines for Discipline Hearings available for download here.

Please book your attendance at a disciplinary hearing by emailing the College at general@collegeofnaturopaths.on.ca

Dates of hearings are subject to change at any time. Those scheduled to attend a hearing should confirm whether dates have changed by checking the current hearing schedule before coming to the College. Visitors are prohibited from carrying into or using while inside the Discipline Hearing Room, any audio/visual equipment (including video cameras, still photography equipment, laptop computers and tape recorders) without prior written permission.

Upcoming Discipline Hearings

As a part of its transparency initiatives, the College ensures that the public is aware of the status of each matter being brought before the Discipline Committee.
To review a general outline of the stages of a disciplinary matter involving a Member of the College, click here.  
To review a complete copy of all current Notices of Hearing and Specified Allegations against a Member of the College, click here. 

Referral Date
Member Name / Status
Summary of Allegations*

Hearing Date(s)
November 5, 2020  Blaszczyk, Anna  Status: Stage 2 The Registrant

1. Anna Blaszczyk (the “Registrant”) registered with the Board of Directors of Drugless Therapy – Naturopathy on or about September 1, 1991. The Registrant then became registered with the College of Naturopaths of Ontario (the “College”) on July 1, 2015.

Failing to co-operate with the Quality Assurance Committee


2. In or about July 2019, the Registrant was randomly selected to undergo a 2019-2020 Peer & Practice Assessment (“PPA”) in accordance with Section 7(2) of the College’s Quality Assurance (“QA”) Regulation.

3. It is alleged that the Registrant failed to complete the PPA and/or failed to meet with and/or co-operate with the QA assessor.

Acts of Professional Misconduct

4. It is alleged that the above noted conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to section 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, being Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (the “Code”) as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 36 - Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts, including but not limited to s. 4 and s. 7 of the Quality Assurance Regulation;
b. Paragraph 46 - Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

5. It is also alleged that the above noted conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to section 51(1)(b.0.1) of the Code.

Practising while suspended

6. On April 2, 2020 the Registrant’s certificate of registration was suspended for her failure to maintain professional liability insurance.

7. It is alleged that, despite her suspension, the Registrant continued to identify herself as a naturopathic doctor and/or used protected titles and designations on social media.

8. It is alleged that the Registrant also identified herself as a “dermatologist” on social media.

9. It is alleged that in or around June 2020 an undercover investigator of the College (using the alias Zach Barrett) called the Registrant. It is alleged that the Registrant advised Zach Barrett that:

  1. She was a dermatologist;
  2. She specialized in skin and sexually transmitted diseases; and/or
  3. She could be called “Dr. Blaszczyk”.

10. It is alleged that on or about July 15, 2020 Zach Barrett attended at the Registrant’s home for a scheduled appointment. It is alleged that the following occurred:

  1. The Registrant asked Zach Barrett to complete an intake form which stated the Registrant’s name and the title “Naturopathic Doctor”;
  2. Zach Barrett noted several forms which identified the Registrant as a naturopathic doctor and/or as being authorized to use protected titles and designations;
  3. The Registrant advised Zach Barrett that he was experiencing insomnia and low energy;
  4. The Registrant used a machine called a “MORA” to check the electricity in Zach Barrett’s organs;
  5. Following this assessment, the Registrant informed Zach Barrett that he had food allergies, candida, weak adrenals, hypoglycemia, and/or a weak gall bladder;
  6. The Registrant advised a change in diet and stated that the reason he was experiencing insomnia and low energy was because of these issues; and/or
  7. The Registrant charged Zach Barrett $150.00 for the appointment.

11. It is alleged that after the Registrant became aware of the College investigation she called Zach Barrett and advised him that if the College called him, he should say the following:

  1. That he visited her as a “friend of a friend”;
  2. That he did not pay her; and/or
  3. That he knew the Registrant was not practising as a naturopathic doctor.

Acts of Professional Misconduct

12. It is alleged that the above noted conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to section 51(1)(c) of the Code as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

  1. Paragraph 1 – Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession, including but not limited to the following:
    1. Advertising standard of practice; and/or
    2. Restricted Titles standard of practice;
  2. Paragraph 27 - Permitting the advertising of the member or his or her practice in a manner that is false or misleading or that includes statements that are not factual and verifiable;
  3. Paragraph 30 - Inappropriately using a term, title or designation in respect of the member’s practice;
  4. Paragraph 36 - Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts, including but limited to s. 4 and s. 8 of the Act;
  5. Paragraph 39- Practising the profession while the member’s certificate of registration has been suspended;
  6. Paragraph 40- Directly or indirectly benefiting from the practice of the profession while the member’s certificate of registration is suspended unless full disclosure is made by the member to the College of the nature of the benefit to be obtained and prior approval is obtained from the Executive Committee;
  7. Paragraph 46 - Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional; and/or
  8. Paragraph 47 - Engaging in conduct that would reasonably be regarded by members as conduct unbecoming a member of the profession.
13. It is also alleged that the above noted conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 4(3) of the Naturopathy Act.
TBA 
 August 1, 2019 Deshko, Yelena
Status: Stage 4

1. At all relevant times, Dr. Yelena Deshko, ND (the “Member”) has been a member of the College of Naturopaths of Ontario (the “College”).

2. The Member met the Therapeutic and IVIT Standards in or about October 2015.

3. At all relevant times, the Member worked at and/or owned Timeless Health Clinic in Toronto, Ontario (the “Clinic”). The Clinic is not a laboratory or a specimen collection centre pursuant to the Laboratory and Specimen Collection Centre Licensing Act.

Improper Delegation

4. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015, the Member delegated the act of administering a substance by injection (via IVIT and/or intramuscularly) and/or performing a procedure on tissue below the dermis (drawing blood) to a nurse and/or nurses.

5. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015, the Member delegated the act of compounding to a nurse and/or nurses and did not record information as required in s. 19 of Regulation 168/15.

6. 
It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, being Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (the “Code”) as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. Paragraph 23- Failing to keep records in accordance with the standards of the profession;

c. 
Paragraph 36 - Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts; and/or

d. 
Paragraph 46 - Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

7. It is also alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to subsection 4(3) of the Naturopathy Act, 2007.

Charging Block Fees

8. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015, the Member sold packages or blocks of treatment to patients.

9. 
It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Code, as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. Paragraph 23 - Failing to keep records in accordance with the standards of the profession; and/or

c. Paragraph 46 -
Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

Laboratory Compliance

10. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015, the Member:

a. Ordered specimens to be sent and/or sent specimens to laboratories not licensed by the Laboratory and Specimen Collection Centre Licensing Act; and/or 

b. Requisitioned the collection of urine, and/or saliva, and/or blood for tests:

  1. At the Clinic and/or
  2. That are outside the scope of a naturopath. 

11. It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Code, as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. 
Paragraph 8 - Providing or attempting to provide services or treatment that the member knows or ought to know to be beyond the member’s knowledge, skill or judgment;

c. Paragraph 9
- Failing to advise a patient or the patient’s authorized representative to consult another member of a health profession within the meaning of the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, when the member knows or ought to know that the patient requires a service that the member does not have the knowledge, skill or judgment to offer or is beyond his or her scope of practice;

d. Paragraph 10
- Performing a controlled act that the member is not authorized to perform;

e. Paragraph 36
- Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts; and/or

f. Paragraph 46
- Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

12. It is also alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to subsection 4(3) of the Naturopathy Act, 2007.

Advertising and Administration Concerns

13. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015, the Clinic offered and/or the Member administered to and/or the Member recommended to and/or the Member ordered and/or the Member delegated the following treatments to patients:

a. Lipotropic B12 injection that includes choline, inositol, chromium and/or methionine;

b. Immune Boost injection that includes Vitamin C;

c. Immune Boosting IV that includes anti-viral botanicals;

d. Gluthathione injection that includes procaine and/or Procaine injection;

e. 
Iron IV that includes iron;

f. 
Fresh Start Detox that can “help reset your metabolism.”

14. It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Code, as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. 
Paragraph 8 - Providing or attempting to provide services or treatment that the member knows or ought to know to be beyond the member’s knowledge, skill or judgment;

c. 
Paragraph  9 - Failing to advise a patient or the patient’s authorized representative to consult another member of a health profession within the meaning of the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, when the member knows or ought to know that the patient requires a service that the member does not have the knowledge, skill or judgment to offer or is beyond his or her scope of practice;

d. 
Paragraph 10 - Performing a controlled act that the member is not authorized to perform;

e. 
Paragraph 23 - Failing to keep records in accordance with the standards of the profession;

f. 
Paragraph 27 - Permitting the advertising of the member or his or her practice in a manner that is false or misleading or that includes statements that are not factual and verifiable;

g. 
Paragraph 36 - Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts; and/or

h. Paragraph 46 - Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

15. It is also alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to subsection 4(3) of the Naturopathy Act, 2007.

Falsification and Misleading Records

16. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015:

a. the Member issued and/or permitted to be issued, invoices that indicated the Member provided treatment when she did not do so; and/or

b. the Member charted in patient records that she treated patients when she did not do so.

17. It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Code, as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. Paragraph 18
- Issuing an invoice, bill or receipt that the member knows or ought to know is false or misleading;

c. Paragraph 23
- Failing to keep records in accordance with the standards of the profession;

d. 
Paragraph 25 - Falsifying a record relating to the member’s practice;

e. Paragraph 36 -
Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts; and/or

f. Paragraph 46
- Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

Testimonials

18. It is alleged that since July 1, 2015, the Clinic’s FaceBook page included a testimonial of the Member’s and/or Clinic’s service.

19. It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Code, as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. 
Paragraph 27 - Permitting the advertising of the member or his or her practice in a manner that is false or misleading or that includes statements that are not factual and verifiable;

c. Paragraph 28
- Using or permitting the use of a testimonial from a patient, former patient or other person in respect of the member’s practice; 

d. Paragraph 36
- Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts;  and/or

e. Paragraph 46 
- Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

Health Track-Pro

20. It is alleged that on or about December 12, 2018 an undercover investigator of the College ordered “Health Track-Pro” from the Clinic’s website. Health Track-Pro included a blood work requisition and one hour appointment with a naturopath from the Clinic.

21. The undercover investigator was not a patient of the Member.

22. It is alleged that once the undercover investigator paid $270 she was provided the following via email:

a. An electronic requisition signed by the Member. The electronic requisition ordered the following blood tests:

i. Lipid Profile
ii.CBC
iii. Ferritin
iv. Glucose Fasting
v. Chemistry Panel M
vi. 
Chemistry Panel N
vii. TSH

b. An invoice from Health Track Pro for a Basic Check-Up.

23. It is alleged that after the undercover investigator had her blood drawn at a laboratory (with the electronic requisition as described in paragraph 22) she was contacted by the Clinic and offered an appointment to meet with another naturopath at the Clinic.  It is alleged that the undercover investigator asked to meet with the Member.

24. It is alleged that on or about January 23, 2019 the undercover investigator had a 30 minute appointment with the Member.

25. It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Code, as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

a. Paragraph 1 - Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession;

b. Paragraph 8 - Providing or attempting to provide services or treatment that the member knows or ought to know to be beyond the member’s knowledge, skill or judgment;

c. Paragraph 18
- Issuing an invoice, bill or receipt that the member knows or ought to know is false or misleading;

d. Paragraph 23
- Failing to keep records in accordance with the standards of the profession;

e. Paragraph 27
- Permitting the advertising of the member or his or her practice in a manner that is false or misleading or that includes statements that are not factual and verifiable;

f. Paragraph 36
- Contravening, by act or omission, a provision of the Act, the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 or the regulations under either of those Acts; and/or

g. Paragraph 46
- Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

26. It is also alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to subsection 4(3) of the Naturopathy Act, 2007.

 December 7, 2020
December 5, 2019   Rodak, Taras
STATUS:Stage 3

1. At all relevant times, Dr. Taras Rodak, ND (“the Member”) has been a member of the College.

2. The Member works at and owns the Clinic in Etobicoke, Ontario.

Electro-Dermal Screening for Member's Patients

3. 
The Member retains Ms. G as an independent contractor to provide electro-dermal screening (“EDS”) to his patients at the Clinic.

4. Ms. G is not a member of the College or any regulatory health college.

5. 
The Member permits Ms. G to provide EDS to her own personal clients at the Clinic. The Member does not provide EDS or administer EDS.

6. 
The Member’s patients sign a separate “Informed consent agreement” for the services provided by Ms. G. Ms. G performs the screening and makes treatment recommendations based on the results.

7. 
The Member charges his patients $150 for the EDS service. The Member pays Ms. G $90 for the provision of each EDS service.

8. 
The Member then charges $15 for a naturopathic consult that involves the Member reviewing the results of the EDS with his patient.

9. Ms. G charges her personal clients $150 for the initial and follow up EDS service provided at the Clinic. Ms. G charges her personal clients $90 for the follow up evaluations at her own clinic.

10. 
It is alleged that the Member issued or permitted to be issued invoices for the services he did not provide. In particular, the Member issued invoices: 

  1. Indicating that the Member provided EDS to his patients instead of Ms. G;
  2. Indicating that the provision of EDS to his patients was a naturopathic service yet provided by Ms. G; and/or
  3. That did not identify the actual cost and/or the mark up of the EDS service.

11. It is alleged that the Member did not audit his invoices to ensure accuracy and compliance with the College standards.

12. 
It is alleged that the above conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to s. 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, being Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (the “Code”) as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007

  1. Paragraph 1 (Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession) including but not limited to:
    1. Fees and Billing Standard; and/or
    2. Record Keeping Standard;
  2. Paragraph 18 (Issuing an invoice, bill or receipt that the member knows or ought to know is false or misleading);
  3. Paragraph 19. (Charging a fee that is excessive in relation to the services or products provided);
  4. Paragraph 23. (Failing to keep records in accordance with the standards of the profession);
  5. Paragraph 24 (Signing or issuing, in his or her professional capacity, a document that the member knows or ought to know contains a false or misleading statement); and/or
  6. Paragraph 46 (Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional).
TBA

September 10, 2020  Turner, Natasha
Status: Stage 2
The Registrant

1. Dr. Natasha Turner, ND (the “Registrant”) registered with the Board of Directors of Drugless Therapy – Naturopathy on or about October 28, 1999. The Registrant then became registered with the College of Naturopaths of Ontario (the “College”) on July 1, 2015.

Advertising protection against and treatment of COVID-19

2. As of March 1, 2020 Ontario and Canada were responding to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic.

3. As of March 1, 2020 there was no known cure to COVID-19 and/or immunization to COVID-19.

4. On or around March 23, 2020 the Registrant posted or permitted to be posted the following information on the website, www.drnatashaturner.com:

  1. “We are also providing an immune boost kit found on shop.drnatashaturner.com. Dr. Turner, ND created a researched based selection of products that can help to protect you from the virus and also to be taken in higher doses should you test positive.”


5. On or around March 23, 2020 the Registrant posted or permitted to be posted the following information on the website,
www.drnatashaturner.com about the benefits of the immune boost kit:

COVID-19 Prevention Build-Your-Own Kit (Science-Based) 1-2 months supply – Recommend 3 months

  1. Aids In Immune Function
  2. Provides Antioxidant Activity
  3. Provides Natural Antiviral Support Due To The Olive Leaf Extract In The Clear Immune Essential
  4. Can Protect Against The COVID-19 Virus Due To Immune And Antiviral Support
  5. Suggested For Use During The Pandemic
  6. Can Help To Treat The Symptoms Should An Infection Arise
  7. Safe For Use For Men And Women. If You Are Taking Immuno-Supressive Drugs Contact Your Medical Professional
  8. Exception For Those Who Are Immune Compromised Or HIV Positive

Acts of Professional Misconduct

6. It is alleged that the above noted conduct constitutes professional misconduct pursuant to section 51(1)(c) of the Health Professions Procedural Code, being Schedule 2 to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (the “Code”) as set out in one or more of the following paragraphs of section 1 of Ontario Regulation 17/14 made under the Naturopathy Act, 2007:

  1. Paragraph 1 – Contravening, by act or omission, a standard of practice of the profession or failing to maintain the standard of practice of the profession, including but not limited to the following:
    1. Advertising standard of practice; and/or
    2. Conflict of Interest standard of practice;
  2. Paragraph 7 – Recommending or providing treatment that the member knows or ought to know is unnecessary or ineffective;
  3. Paragraph 8 – Providing or attempting to provide services or treatment that the member knows or ought to know to be beyond the member’s knowledge, skill or judgment;
  4. Paragraph 14  Prescribing, dispensing, compounding or selling a drug or a substance for an improper purpose;
  5. Paragraph 17 Acting in a conflict of interest when acting in a professional capacity;
  6. Paragraph 26 Making a claim respecting a drug, substance, remedy, treatment, device or procedure other than a claim that can be supported as reasonable professional opinion; and/or
  7. Paragraph 46  Engaging in conduct or performing an act relevant to the practice of the profession that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.
TBA